ADJUSTABLE-TIP VS FIXED-TIP NEEDLES IN RFA FOR BENIGN THYROID NODULES: ITALIAN STUDY

In this retrospective study, outcomes of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for benign thyroid nodules were compared between the adjustable-tip needle (ATN) and fixed-needle (FTN) techniques in 36 patients. Both approaches showed similar results over 6 months of follow-up, with no significant differences in volume reduction, volume reduction rate (VRR), or success rates (defined as ≥50% reduction). ATN was noted for its ease of use, potentially facilitating a shorter learning curve for operators, although patient satisfaction and safety outcomes were comparable between the two techniques.

0

Quiz Fifty Five

1 / 5

What is the main advantage of adjustable-tip needles in RFA according to the study?

They cause less pain

They are easier to use

They provide more precise ablation

They are less expensive

2 / 5

In which country was this study conducted?

Japan

Germany

Italy

United States

3 / 5

What is being compared in this Italian study?

Different brands of needles used in RFA

Ultrasound-guided biopsy versus RFA

Adjustable-tip needles versus fixed-tip needles

Effectiveness of RFA versus surgery

4 / 5

What type of thyroid nodules are being treated in this study?

Metastatic thyroid nodules

Inflammatory thyroid nodules

Benign thyroid nodules

Malignant thyroid nodules

5 / 5

What does RFA stand for in the context of this study?

Radiographic Frequency Ablation

Radiologic Fine Assessment

Radiofrequency Ablation

Radioactive Frequency Analysis

Your score is

LinkedIn Facebook Twitter VKontakte