Management of high-grade renal trauma, particularly grade IV injuries, remains a complex and evolving field. While blunt renal trauma is often managed conservatively, penetrating trauma frequently necessitates immediate surgical intervention due to hemodynamic instability and associated injuries. This study retrospectively analyzed 126 grade IV renal trauma cases from a cohort of 934 high-grade renal trauma patients (AAST grade III-V) treated between 2005 and 2023 at a level 1 trauma center. Of these, 35 cases involved penetrating trauma, and 91 involved blunt trauma. Patients with penetrating injuries were significantly younger and predominantly male. Immediate intervention rates were notably higher for penetrating injuries (28.6%) compared to blunt injuries (11%), particularly for urinary extravasation (UE) at presentation (p=0.03). During the index admission, 32% of penetrating trauma patients initially managed without intervention required delayed procedures, such as stenting, nephrectomy, or renorrhaphy, for collecting system injuries. In contrast, only 7.4% of blunt trauma patients required delayed intervention. Multivariate analysis adjusted for injury severity revealed that patients with penetrating injuries and UE initially managed conservatively were 3.9 times more likely to require delayed intervention compared to their blunt trauma counterparts (OR 3.9, 1.24-12.95). These findings underscore the challenges of conservative management in grade IV penetrating renal injuries with UE and highlight the importance of careful monitoring and follow-up. While conservative management remains an option, the lower success rate in this population emphasizes the need for a tailored approach, potentially incorporating advanced imaging such as ultrasound for ongoing assessment. This study provides critical insights into the differing management pathways and outcomes for blunt versus penetrating renal trauma, advocating for refined strategies to improve patient outcomes.