ALGORITHMIC BIAS IN ENDOMETRIAL CANCER SCREENING

No results found.

A new study published in JAMA Oncology reveals that a common algorithm using transvaginal ultrasound to check for endometrial cancer is unreliable for Black women. The study, led by Dr. Kemi Doll from the University of Washington School of Medicine, analyzed ultrasound data from 1,500 Black women and found that nearly 10% of those with endometrial cancer had an endometrial thickness below the common cut-off point of 4 millimeters. This highlights the need for a tissue biopsy, rather than relying solely on ultrasound, to accurately diagnose endometrial cancer in Black women. Endometrial cancer, the most common gynecological cancer in the U.S., is on the rise, particularly among Black women who are often diagnosed at later stages.

1

Quiz Ten

1 / 5

How can healthcare providers address algorithmic bias in endometrial cancer screening?

2 / 5

What is a potential consequence of algorithmic bias in endometrial cancer screening?

3 / 5

Which of the following can be a source of algorithmic bias in cancer screening?

4 / 5

How can algorithmic bias impact endometrial cancer screening outcomes?

5 / 5

What is algorithmic bias in the context of endometrial cancer screening?

Read More

Contact Support

If you're interested in posting an article and need assistance, please don't hesitate to contact our support team. We're here to help you through the process, answer any questions you may have, and ensure that your article is published smoothly and effectively.

support@ehealthcommunity.org