Pre-Legalization Surrogacy Solutions in Michigan

When Tammy and Jordan Myers first held their premature twins in a Grand Rapids neonatal intensive care unit, their moment was overshadowed by a legal battle for parental rights. Despite using embryos created from Jordan’s sperm and Tammy’s eggs, the couple faced a court ruling that denied them legal recognition as parents, forcing them to adopt their own biological children. Michigan’s previous surrogacy restrictions left families in legal limbo, often compelling them to seek surrogacy out of state or find private arrangements, as exemplified by the Myers’ experience. In April, Governor Gretchen Whitmer signed legislation repealing a 1988 criminal ban on surrogacy, allowing legal contracts and compensation for surrogates after decades of restrictions. However, this change has sparked concerns among conservative and religious groups who argue that surrogacy exploits women and commodifies children. Critics like Genevieve Marnon of Right to Life of Michigan believe that the previous adoption requirement safeguarded children from being treated as commodities, while supporters of the repeal emphasize the emotional and familial motivations behind surrogacy. For couples like Eric Portenga and Kevin O’Neill, the repeal means greater security; they sought surrogacy support through social media after being quoted exorbitant costs in other states. They ultimately partnered with a surrogate from Ohio, where surrogacy is legal, allowing for a formal contract that provided protections for all parties involved. As these families navigate the evolving legal landscape, the implications of Michigan’s new surrogacy laws continue to resonate, raising critical questions about parental rights, women’s agency, and the future of family-building in the state.
Read More