PORTABLE ULTRASOUND IN LOW-MIDDLE INCOME COUNTRIES

The study systematically reviews the use of hand-carried and hand-held ultrasound devices in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), highlighting their clinical applications, geographical distribution, and impact on patient management. The review included 36 studies, showing these devices’ successful use in diagnosing and managing critical conditions, especially for obstetrical and abdominal issues, with a significant potential impact on clinical management. However, the evidence quality is low, and there is a need for larger clinical trials to better assess their effectiveness in resource-limited settings.

0

Quiz Seventy One

1 / 5

What might be a challenge faced when implementing portable ultrasound devices in low-middle income countries?

Overabundance of healthcare facilities

High literacy rates among patients

Lack of trained personnel and maintenance issues

Excessive availability of high-tech equipment

2 / 5

Which aspect of healthcare does the use of portable ultrasound primarily impact?

Health insurance policies

Pharmaceutical distribution

Diagnostic imaging

Surgical procedures

3 / 5

What is a likely benefit of using portable ultrasound devices in these regions?

Longer wait times for patients

Reduced need for medical training

Improved access to diagnostic imaging

Increased cost of healthcare

4 / 5

In which regions are portable ultrasounds being assessed?

Developed nations

Urban areas only

Low-middle income countries

High-income countries

5 / 5

What is the primary focus of the title?

Pediatric ultrasound applications

High-income country healthcare

Use of portable ultrasound devices

Advanced ultrasound techniques

Your score is

LinkedIn Facebook Twitter VKontakte