ULTRASOUND VERSUS CONVENTIONAL CHEST RADIOGRAPHY AFTER ULTRASOUND GUIDED INSERTION OF A CENTRAL LINE

A prospective observational study compared the use of ultrasound (US) and conventional chest radiograph (CCR) for detecting post-insertion complications and confirming the proper position of central venous catheters (CVCs) in adult patients. Among 46 patients, US and CCR were equally effective in detecting pneumothorax (none detected). Proper CVC position was confirmed in 45 out of 46 patients using both methods. US was more time-efficient, with an average CCR waiting time of 20 minutes. The study concluded that the US is as effective as CCR for CVC placement verification and is the preferred method due to its efficiency.

0

Quiz Sixty Three

1 / 5

What might a sonographer need to differentiate when examining gallbladder polyps?

2 / 5

Who is the intended audience for the information in this title?

3 / 5

What is the primary subject of this title?

4 / 5

What imaging technique is used to examine gallbladder polyps?

5 / 5

What is the editorial comment questioning about abbreviated breast MRI?

ULTRASOUND VERSUS CONVENTIONAL CHEST RADIOGRAPHY AFTER ULTRASOUND GUIDED INSERTI…

by Echo Writer time to read: <1 min
0

Contact Support

If you're interested in posting an article and need assistance, please don't hesitate to contact our support team. We're here to help you through the process, answer any questions you may have, and ensure that your article is published smoothly and effectively.

support@ehealthcommunity.org